Consumers tell CFPB about their Overdraft Fee Nightmares

by
Adam Rust

Consumer narratives from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's (the "CFPB") complaint database reveal how overdraft fees harm people.

Testimonies within the database present compelling  evidence to demonstrate how overdraft fees can place consumers into a cycle of debt that wreaks havoc upon their finances. These stories are copied verbatim as published by the CFPB. In some instances, the CFPB has redacted portions of their commentary. (Note: I use four "X's" to note the redactions.)

One person says overdraft fees put her in a cycle of debt:
I bank with PNC Bank. I have for ten years. They continue to take money from my account. I have had {$930.00} taken in the past two weeks. I have had XXXX {$36.00} fees ( {$140.00} ) totalling {$540.00} just on the same XXXX checks. These fees include a {$36.00} overdraft fee and {$36.00} return check fee on XXXX separate occasions. They attempted to put the check back through when there was no money to cover them. I have an automatic deposit each week. I looked, and the deposit went the through last night for this week, and the next day my card was declined. They fabricated XXXX overdraft fees ( {$140.00} ) which made my account negative {$88.00}. The account would not be negative if not for these fees. I can not pay my utilities. I have XXXX XXXX children and can not afford food electric or water. I have had a negative balance for two weeks, and they have charged several {$21.00} fees for maintaining a negative balance and an additional numerous if not daily {$7.00} fee for the same reason. I have paperwork to show these fees. I need help. I ca n't close an account with outstanding checks and ca n't make deposits without them taking it all for themselves. PLEASE HELP ME. I need this money back to care for my XXXX children.

One person contends her bank used overdraft fees to steal her money:

I am XXXX years old; I have an account with Wells Fargo, Acct # XXXX. On Sunday, XXXX XXXX, 2015, the day before XXXX, I purchased food at XXXX XXXX and wrote a check # XXXX in the amount of XXXX}. I also wrote a check on Tuesday, XXXX XXXX, 2015, the day after XXXX, on XXXX XXXX, 2015 I receive a survivors benefit check in the amount of {$XXXX} which post XXXX XXXX, XXXX Eastern Standard Time. On the back of Check # XXXX in the amount of {$75.00} The XXXX stamped it XXXX XXXX, 2015 as being processed, the money was in my account, Wells Fargo fraudulently charged me a service charge of {$35.00}. They also charged me {$35.00} service charge for Check # XXXX in the amount of XXXX. These XXXX checks were covered because my direct deposit from Social Security was in the account. I went to Wells Fargo and spoke to the Manager of the Store, XXXX XXXX, ID XXXX, she took the bank statement along with the XXXX checks and proceeded into her office not asking me to come into her office while she looked at the copies. XXXX minutes later, she comes out into the lobby where I waited and broke the privacy act discussing my account with a lobby full of customers. She treated me with no respect, and I feel discriminated against me because she saw I was elderly, she failed to ask for my identification. She failed to see on the back of the check the date was stamped XXXX XXXX, 2015 for check number XXXX by The XXXX. It is my opinion Wells Fargo should investigate this store manager, the proof is on the back of the check, and she had no right to discriminate me and embarrass me in front of a lobby full of people. I am asking that Wells Fargo refund my money and an apology letter on behalf of their Store Manager, XXXX XXXX she should not work at a bank who judges people by the way they look.

Another writes that a bank allowed a payday lender to debit a closed account:
My Citizens bank account in 2011 was hit by a payday loan firm multiple times a day, causing me to achieve overdraft fees of over XXXX dollars. I asked the bank to freeze my account, so this would not happen and they told me they could not because I was at a negative balance. I had to get a law firm to send a letter XXXX the put my account on a freeze. By then it was XXXX dollars in the hole, and not a single penny was as a result of an overage. Every single cent was b/c of NSF charges so this cost the bank XXXX dollars but is still on my ChexSystems report. It's killing me on getting a car loan.

Consumer fails to cancel a recurring ACH event after closing an account. The bank continues to debit the account. Since there are no funds in the closed account, each new debit creates a new overdraft fee. The bank doesn't tell the account holder (as the relationship between the bank and the customer has ended) and instead refers the account to a collection agency.

I had an account with Fifth Third bank that I had not used in over a year. There was a single deduction still being made from the account that I was unaware of. I was notified by an automated phone call that there was a problem with my account, which prompted me to call the bank. Upon making this call, I learned that there was an overdraft ; informing me that the account -- that I thought was inactive -- was still being debited. I asked the individual how I could bring the account current; the option of just paying the debt via a credit card ( which I later found out would have been an option ) was not offered. He offered no solution other than for the company to whom the payment was made to refund the money to the bank. I have never received any mailings regarding the account being delinquent or overdrawn from XXXX bank. I did, however, receive a mailing from XXXX XXXX collections agency to my correct and current address which they stated was obtained from Fifth Third bank. I am curious as to why the bank did not send me any notification of the accounts status or its pending transfer to a collections agency. I have subsequently paid off this debt in full to the collections agency but am unhappy that a customer of any bank could be sent to collections without proper notification; particularly after I had reached out to them to correct the problem. It is also interesting that the collections agency actually obtained my address from XXXX bank per their employee ( name and employee number in my possession ). And, to boot, the account could have simply been brought current and closed over the phone avoiding all of the hassles and headaches thus far.

By using high-to-low check sequencing, a bank maximizes overdraft volume from one overage event:
Citizens Bank, and banks in general, when there are overdraft situations, charge from the highest check down. I.E., XXXX went through, and I did n't know it. It was {$30.00}, and I had another item. They took the larger item first, which overdrew me by $1.00 and then the lowest item. If they had taken the lowest item first, it would have been only XXXX fee. THIS IS JUST A WAY for them to make money. When you talk to them about it, they say Do n't you want the highest paid first. '' Well, it really doesn't matter because they pay it and charge you. Very poor practices and I can't believe it 's allowed! Thanks.

The Wisewage blog is not intended to describe any particular product mentioned elsewhere on the site. Please refer to each product page for details about any specific product. You can read our full legal statement about the blog here.